1
Month Into Smoking Ban: Hookah Lounge Suffers.
By
Beth Wick - Madison Magazine Writer - August 16, 2005
MADISON,
Wis. -- A month has passed since Madison passed the smoking ban,
but the smoke hasn’t cleared just yet. Other concerns have
surfaced from both sides of the issue, with different perspectives
on the current provisions in place.
Smoking
continues in Madison outside of bar entrances, and more people exit
bars periodically throughout the evening to catch a smoke as friends
save a table inside the bar.
So
far, the smoking ban has earned mixed reviews among the different
groups impacted under the legislation. While the city is certainly
protecting the health of bar patrons, there are still considerations
that should be heard after reviewing a month with this prohibition.
Bar
Owner In Madison
Bars,
restaurants and taverns in Madison have seen their revenues drop
because of the smoking ban. The Casbah at 119 E. Main St. in downtown
Madison is one venue greatly impacted by the ban since most of its
evening business relies on the revenue from hookahs.
A hookah is a device used to smoke flavored
tobacco, but the smoke emitted is not as heavy as cigarette
smoke. A hookah doesn’t produce the same type of smoke as
cigarettes. Atteyih explained that smoke from the hookahs is more
pleasant because the smoke is run through the water, which eliminates
almost all of the heavy particles.
Owner
and executive chef Sabi Atteyih explained The Casbah’s intent
is to be a culinary, cultural and travel experience for people in
Madison without having to leave the city. Atteyih said the hookahs
added to the overall experience, although the majority of The Casbah’s
profits are from the restaurant.
“Since
1999 we offered hookahs as part of the reason for people from different
backgrounds to congregate,” Atteyih said. “What started
out as a reason for people from different backgrounds to share in
the conversation and discuss issues related to world peace became
an interest point for me.”
Hookahs,
under the current provisions can’t be smoked indoors since
it is a tobacco product, but they can be smoked outside. Since the
smoking ban, Atteyih moved hookahs to the sidewalk café,
weather permitting, but currently has no plans for the winter.
“The
hookahs were a big part of our evening traffic, and I consider that
shot,” Atteyih said. “The tragedy is there was nothing
considered for someone like us, where a large percentage of our
evening money comes from hookahs, especially after 11 p.m.”
Before
the smoking ban, The Casbah prohibited smoking before 10 p.m., including
hookahs. In fact, The Casbah banned all smoking, except for hookahs,
on January 1, 2005, in an attempt to show how it could control smoking
in the establishment without the city’s help.
“I
can see why the city is concerned, and I can see why the legislation
is in place to make sure that the workplace environment is safe
for all,” Atteyih said. “But of all of our employees
that worked in the evening, they all had the option of working during
the day when we have fourteen hours of smoke-free environment.”
According
to Atteyih, most employees that worked at night smoked and enjoyed
the experience of the hookahs.
Atteyih
believes smoke emitted from a hookah is
far less problematic than alcohol and wonders how far the city will
go.
“My
question is, what next?” Atteyih said.
Non-Smokers
While
many non-smokers are happy to be in bars with clearer, cleaner air
without the risks of secondhand smoke, some non-smokers shared their
concerns.
Nate
Chin, a supporter of the smoking ban, has been to the bars about
eight times since the smoking ban was passed. After the ban, Chin
says bars have better air quality and have an all-around better
atmosphere.
“It’s
a lot clearer in there. I can actually see across the bar, and breathing
is a lot easier,” Chin said. “I notice a very significant
difference.”
Chin,
however, had a different concern with the ban: since smokers are
forced to move outdoors, they will litter the sidewalk with their
cigarettes.
“Since
the smoking ban, a lot of people are smoking outside of the bars
and along the streets. That means they are leaving butts all over
the ground,” Chin said. “As an environmentalist, that
bothers me, and I feel that when the city council implemented this
statute, they should have considered that and put more wastebaskets
outside or done something to curb this littering and pollution.”
Currently,
restaurant and tavern owners are in charge of cleaning the sidewalks
in front of their establishments.
Alex
Bean offers a different viewpoint, claiming the ban ruins the atmosphere
of bars and being out with friends who smoke.
“I
don’t think it really helps the atmosphere at the bars. It
takes my friends away from me,” Bean said. “Although
I don’t smoke myself, it still is an inconvenience for me
to go outside and be with my friends.”
Bean
said he was unable to tell the difference from the air quality in
bars now, compared to before the ban.
“I
don’t have a problem being in an atmosphere where [people]
smoke,” Bean added. “It’s my choice to be there,
and it’s other peoples’ choices to smoke, and I have
to deal with it.”
Adam
Siegel is indifferent about the ban. Though Siegel says breathing
is easier, he adds the smoke masked bad odors, grittiness and dinginess
in bars.
He
has been to the bars in Madison about five times since the ban,
but said he’s more likely to visit bars outside city limits.
“Indirectly,
it has influenced me to go outside of Madison to seek entertainment,”
Siegel said. “Whether we are going bowling or going to the
bars, you end up going elsewhere because the smokers in the group
would prefer to go to someplace where they can smoke.”
Employees
Perhaps
the most impacted from the ban are bar employees. Kim Fine, an employee
at Buck’s, says that while she works one day a week from 11
a.m. to 7 p.m., she has talked to other employees that work night
shifts and they’ve seen a decrease in the number of patrons.
“For
me, I haven’t seen much of a difference,” Fine said.
“But I think a lot of the other employees that work at night
have seen much more of an effect in terms of less customers.”
Molly
Coughlin worked at a bar last summer in Madison. She was bothered
by the smoke, from both customers and employees who smoked while
working.
“Working
there was definitely a turn-off when you had to deal with all the
smoke,” Coughlin said. “I
would not feel great after it, and I know some of my co-workers
who were allergic to smoke and those with asthma actually had health
issues because of the smoke. And, whenever you had to work at night,
the quantity or the amount of smoke you were around just shot through
the roof. You could never come home and just go to bed – you
would have to take a shower when you got off of work.”
Since
then, Coughlin stopped working at the bar, citing smoking as one
of the reasons.
“It
just made the atmosphere kind of unpleasant,” Coughlin said.
Smoker
When
walking around downtown, it’s easy to spot the abundance of
smokers who exit bars not to catch a breath of fresh air, but to
light up a cigarette. Many of these sidewalk smokers refused an
interview, but one had an opinion.
Luke
McDonnell was standing outside The Annex smoking, since he was unable
to light up during a concert he was seeing. He was frustrated with
the smoking ban, and thought the ban ruined the atmosphere of going
out to bars.
“It’s
horrible,” McDonnell said. “I’m missing a great
band right now, and I have to come out here and smoke a cigarette.”
Although
McDonnell dislikes the ban, he understands that there should be
limits to smoking in certain environments.
“Something
has to be done. I agree with not smoking everywhere,” McDonnell
said. “When I am sitting down and eating, I don’t want
smoke, but a place like [The Annex], I think there should be smoking.” |