Hookahs
keep on burnin’
by Rob La Gatta
January 25, 2006
Before Washington’s
indoor smoking ban went into effect last December, the outrage of
smokers coupled with the questions of how the law could be fairly
enforced seemed to show that on paper, Initiative 901 is a lot cleaner
and more manageable than it is in practice.
Now more than
a month into effect, the initiative appears to be leaving some gaps.
Though the city’s concert venues and clubs have remained exclusively
smoke-free, certain bars – evidence of which can be seen across
Capitol Hill – have moved it outside, but not 25 feet away
from windows, doors or air ducts.
Establishments
that offer the hookah, a Middle Eastern tobacco pipe gaining popularity
in America, also remain smokey. When asked over the phone, Zaina
Food Drinks & Friends’ employees willingly acknowledged
that they still offer hookahs at both their Pioneer Square and Third
Avenue locations. Yet, next to the counter, signs indicate the owners’
acknowledgement that the law has taken effect.
An employee
from B&O Espresso, a Capitol Hill coffee shop that also offered
hookahs until the ban took effect, said that while his employer
is looking to sell off their water pipes, they are no longer offering
them for use in the shop to “comply with the [smoking] law.”
Enforcement
of I-901 on Seattle University’s campus is another issue that
has yet to be tackled. The smoking areas on campus have almost all
remained identical to what they were before the ban.
Though the school
posts signs saying where smoking cannot happen – usually within
50 feet from entryways – these have been present since long
before the smoking ban and violations are frequent.
“The challenge
is enforcement, and that’s true for many organizations,”
said Catherine Walker, former vice president of administration and
university counsel. “We don’t have security staff standing
around the building entries to catch violators. We rely on peers
to remind others to move away from doors.”
Walker said
that students can report violators if they know their names, but
otherwise very little can be done.
The “Smoker’s
Pit” outside Campion Residence Hall is another smoking spot
that poses a problem. The smoking area meets the requirement of
being 25 feet away from the entrance of the building. But there
are other parts of the building that the area is in violation of
the law.
This includes
the windows leading into the offices of Housing and Residence Life
and student dorms from the second floor up. There is also a stairwell
that exits less than 10 feet from the “Pit.”
According to
Michel George, vice president for Facilities, the issue of enforcement
on campus lies in the hands of Mike Sletten, director of Public
Safety and Transportation.
Sletten said
that he is part of an “SU Team” comprised of Housing
& Residence Life, Faculty, Administration and Public Safety
that is working on evaluating and fixing the campus to fall within
the statewide law.
Still, King
County Public Health officials believe that I-901 has had positive
effects on the city.
“The law
thus far has been a great success and advance for the public’s
health,” said Roger Valdez, manager of King County’s
Tobacco Prevention Program. “We have had very few problem
spots, but given the size of our county we think compliance has
almost been complete.”
Valdez did acknowledge
that certain techniques that some establishments have used –
like allowing smoking outside bars where patrons can take their
drinks – are defying the law because the area is not 25 feet
away from the entrance. Still, he said, when they are contacted
they will comply.
“We have
had about 250 complaints and we have had about 150 businesses we
have communicated with,” said Valdez. “We have made
about 40 visits, and have had almost complete compliance either
by the time of the visit or by the time we left.”
I-901 is on
the books after it was approved by more than 63 percent of Washington
State voters last November.
Though it was
praised by anti-smoking advocates across the country, coverage and
awareness of the issue dropped off after it went into effect. Whether
Seattle residents can expect to see stricter enforcement around
the city as we move into 2006 remains to be seen.
|